Nexus between Robo-Advisory Services and Financial Statement Quality for Investment Advisory and Portfolio Management

Authors

  • A. Amos Anamapele Kenule Beeson Saro-Wiwa Polytechnic, Bori, Port Harcourt, Rivers State

Keywords:

Robo-advisory services, financial statement quality, financial technology, earnings management, investment advisory, portfolio management

Abstract

This study examined the nexus between robo-advisory services and financial statement quality, with a view to determining which financial technology enhances the reliability, transparency, and credibility of corporate financial reporting. The study employed a quantitative research design using panel data collected from selected firms over a specified period. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, panel regression (fixed and random effects), Hausman test, Granger causality test, and error correction model, alongside relevant diagnostic and robustness checks. The results revealed that robo-advisory services have a positive and statistically significant effect on financial statement quality, indicating that the adoption of automated financial technologies improves reporting accuracy and reduces earnings manipulation. The findings also showed that firm size and audit quality positively influence financial statement quality, while leverage has a negative effect, suggesting that highly leveraged firms are more prone to financial reporting distortions. The Hausman test supported the use of the fixed effects model, while the co-integration and error correction results confirmed both long-run and short-run relationships among the variables. Granger causality results further indicated a directional relationship between robo-advisory adoption and financial reporting quality. The study concludes that robo-advisory services are a critical driver of improved financial statement quality, enhancing transparency, accountability, and investor confidence. It recommends increased adoption of financial technologies, stronger regulatory frameworks, and continuous capacity building for financial professionals. The study contributes to the growing body of literature on financial technology by providing empirical evidence on its role in improving financial reporting quality, particularly in emerging economies.

References

Bhimani, A., & Willcocks, L. (2014). Digitisation, “big data” and the transformation of accounting information. Accounting and Business Research, 44(4), 469–490.

Brown Liburd, H., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2015). Big data and audit evidence. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 12(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.2308/jeta-51071

Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies. W. W. Norton & Company.

Chen, J., Hong, H., & Stein, J. C. (2020). Artificial intelligence in business and finance: Challenges and implications. Journal of Financial Economics, 137(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.03.006

Dai, J., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2017). Toward blockchain based accounting and assurance. Journal of Information Systems, 31(3), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.2308/isys 51804

Dechow, P. M., et al. (2010). Accounting quality: Theory and evidence. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(2–3), 344–401.

Gupta, P., & Bose, I. (2019). Fintech in accounting: Adoption, risks, and opportunities. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 34, 40–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2019.04.002

Jensen, M. C. & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304 405X(76)90026 X

Lee, J., Lee, H., & Kim, D. (2019). Artificial intelligence in accounting: Effects on financial reporting quality. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 38(5), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2019.05.004

Sutton, S. G., Holtfrerich, B., & Wiesen, D. (2016). Effects of computerized continuous auditing on financial reporting quality. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 21, 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2016.02.004

Sun, L., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2017). Big data and analytics in continuous auditing: Implications for accounting and auditing. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 14(1), 77–92. https://doi.org/10.2308/jeta 51711

Williams, C., & Kedir, A. (2017). Technology adoption and accounting quality in SMEs: Evidence from developing countries. Small Business Economics, 49(4), 891–909.

Zhang, Y., Xu, H., & Li, J. (2021). AI and financial reporting quality: Evidence from enterprise fintech adoption. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 41, 100512.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-27

How to Cite

Anamapele, A. A. (2026). Nexus between Robo-Advisory Services and Financial Statement Quality for Investment Advisory and Portfolio Management. International Journal of Economic Development Research and Investment (IJEDRI), 16(1), 1–14. Retrieved from https://icidr.org.ng/index.php/Ijedri/article/view/1880