Applications of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in Teaching Mathematics in Nigeria: Challenges and Prospects
Keywords:
ICT, Mathematics Education, Educational Technology, Visualization, Collaborative Learning, Remote LearningAbstract
The paper theoretically and qualitatively explored the applications of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) tools in teaching mathematics in Nigeria. The goal is to review and highlight the challenges and prospects of ICT tools in mathematics education in Nigeria. The findings indicate that several learning theories supported ICT tools in teaching mathematics. Several countries have successfully adopted the principles, with attendant positive results. The result also indicates that ICT in teaching mathematics influences the effective visualization of abstract mathematical concepts, enhances students’ engagement, collaboration, and differentiated learning, and eases assessment. Besides, it supports effective remote learning and the development of computational thinking skills, preparing the learner for further studies and future career prospects in the global digital economy. Hence, the Nigerian government should fast-track the integration of ICT in all facets of mathematics education.
References
Adebayo, O. (2018). Challenges of ICT in education in Nigeria. Journal of Educational Technology, 12(1), 45-56.
Adejoh, O. (2021). Resource allocation and its impact on ICT in education. Nigerian Journal of Educational Administration, 19(2), 123-135
Adenegan, K. E. (2013). The Impact of GeoGebra Software on Students’ Understanding of Geometric Transformation. International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention
Adomi, E. E. (2010). ICT and Literacy in Nigeria: The Internet and Beyond. Library Philosophy and Practice.
Akinyemi, T. & Okafor, N. (2021). Integrating ICT into the mathematics curriculum. International Journal of Educational Research, 15(3), 67-79
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman
Anderson, T., & Dron, J. (2011). Three Generations of Distance Education Pedagogy. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(3), 80-97
Babalola, O., & Adeoye, A. (2022). The future of ICT in Nigerian education. Journal of Digital Education, 10(4), 88-102
Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Prentice Hall.
Bingimlas, K. A. (2009). Barriers to the Successful Integration of ICT in Teaching and Learning Environments: A Review of the Literature. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 5(3), 235-245. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75275
Black, P., & William, D. (1998). Assessment and Classroom Learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7-74.
Blau, I., & Caspi, A. (2009). What type of collaboration helps? Psychological ownership, perceived learning and outcome quality of collaboration using Google Docs. Proceedings of the Chais Conference on Instructional Technologies Research 2009: Learning in the Technological Era
Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. David McKay
Bruff, D. (2012). Teaching with Classroom Response Systems: Creating Active Learning Environments. Jossey-Bass.
Business Day NG (2023). How digital infrastructure gap deepens learning inequalities in Nigeria
Devlin, K. (2000). The language of mathematics: Making the invisible visible. Holt Paperbacks
Ferrari, M. (2020). The Role of ICT in Mathematics Teaching During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Study from Italy. Journal of Online Learning Research and Practice
Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2013). Computational Thinking in K-12: A Review of the State of the Field. Educational Researcher, 42(1), 38-43.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112
Heacox, D. (2012). Differentiating Instruction in the Regular Classroom: How to Reach and Teach All Learners. Free Spirit Publishing
Hohenwarter, M., & Jones, K. (2007). Ways of linking geometry and algebra: The case of GeoGebra. Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, 27(3), 126-131
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An Educational Psychology Success Story: Social Interdependence Theory and Cooperative Learning. Educational Researcher, 38, 365-379. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09339057
Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., & Freeman, A. (2016). NMC horizon report: 2016 K-12 edition. The New Media Consortium
Levy, F. (2003). Teaching and learning with ICT: New contexts for learning. Routledge.
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43-52.
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2010). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. U.S. Department of Education.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054
Newhouse, C. P. (2002). The impact of ICT on learning and teaching: A literature review. Western Australian Department of Education
Niess, M. L. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(5), 509-523
Nwosu, C., & Chikwendu, D. (2019). Teacher competence in ICT integration: Challenges and solutions. Nigerian Journal of Teacher Education, 17(2), 89-101
Ogunleye, J. (2020). Addressing the digital divide in Nigerian education. African Journal of Educational Studies, 14(2), 56-70
Pane, J. F., Griffin, B. A., McCaffrey, D. F., & Karam, R. (2013). Effectiveness of cognitive tutor algebra I at scale. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 35(2), 182-199
Papanastasiou, E. C., Zembylas, M., & Vrasidas, C. (2003). Can Computer Use Hurt Science Achievement? The USA Results from PISA. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 12(3), 325-332
Piaget, J. (1973). To understand is to invent: The future of education. Grossman
Plass, J. L., Homer, B. D., & Kinzer, C. K. (2015). Foundations of game-based learning. Educational Psychologist, 50(4), 258-283.
Resta, P., & Laferrière, T. (2007). Technology in support of collaborative learning. Educational Psychology Review, 19(1), 65-83
Ruthven, K. (2012). The didactical tetrahedron as a heuristic for analysing the incorporation of digital technologies into classroom practice in support of investigative approaches to teaching mathematics. ZDM, 44(5), 627-640.
Schmid, E. C., Thomson, M. M., & Sánchez-Serrano, J. L. (2009). Interactive whiteboards in state school settings: Teacher responses to socio-constructivist HCI tools. Springer.
Selwyn, N. (2011). Education and technology: Key issues and debates. Continuum International Publishing Group
Stewart, I. (2017). The beauty of numbers in nature: Mathematical patterns and principles from the natural world. MIT Press
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem-solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257-285
Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to Differentiate Instruction in Mixed-Ability Classrooms. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD
Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners (2nd ed.). ASCD
UNESCO (2015). Policy guidelines for mobile learning. United Nations educational, scientific and cultural organization
Voogt, J., & Knezek, G. (Eds.). (2008). International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education. Springer
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press
Warschauer, M., Knobel, M., & Stone, L. (2004). Technology and equity in schooling: Deconstructing the digital divide. Educational Policy, 18(4), 562-588
Wenglinsky, H. (1998). Does It Compute? The Relationship between Educational Technology and Students’ Achievement in Mathematics. Educational Testing Service
Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33-35.
Wood, E., Mueller, J., Willoughby, T., Specht, J., & DeYoung, T. (2013). Teachers' perceptions: Barriers and supports to using technology in the classroom. Education, Communication & Information, 3(2), 349-365.
Yushau, B. (2006). The Effects of Blended e-Learning on Mathematics and Computer Attitudes in Pre-Calculus Algebra. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 37(2), 161-173
Yusuf, M. O., & Afolabi, A. O. (2010). Effects of Computer Assisted Instruction on Secondary School Students' Performance in Biology. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Research in Education and Society (JRES)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
