Improvisation and Usefulness of a Scaling Board In Inverse Proportion Problem Solving

Authors

  • F. C. Y. Aprebo Mathematics Department, School of Secondary Science Education, Federal College of Education (Technical), Omoku, Rivers State, Nigeria
  • Uranta Soba Mathematics Department, School of Secondary Science Education, Federal College of Education (Technical), Omoku, Rivers State, Nigeria

Keywords:

Mathematics, inverse proportion, Scaled-Board

Abstract

This study on improvisation of a Scaled-Board and its usefulness in inverse proportion problem, is basically concerned with how a model is improvised to teach an inverse proportion topic in Mathematics which portrays the practical bit of the mathematics. A simple pretest-posttest experimental design and control groups design are used. The model is tested on a randomised sample of 50 students randomly selected from 200 students, out of which 25 of them were taken for the experimental group while the other 25 were taken
for the control group. Mathematics Achievement Test of 3 questions was given to the sampled groups before and after treatment.It explores the stages of the Scaled-Board preparation and how the model is used in solving the inverse proportion topics in Mathematics. The finding shows that the scaled Board is more effective than the calculation method.

Author Biography

Uranta Soba, Mathematics Department, School of Secondary Science Education, Federal College of Education (Technical), Omoku, Rivers State, Nigeria

   

References

Akinotohum, O. F. (2000): Assessing the use of improvisation in Introducing Technology Teaching at Junior Secondary Schools in Ekiti State. STAN 41stAnnual Conference Proceedings, 410-412.

Bernadette, E. (1999). A Comprehensive Analysis of the effect of improvised and Standard Models and Graphics on students Achievement and Interest in Chemistry. STAN Journal, 34 (1 &2), 51-56.

Betiku, O. F. (2000). Improvisation in Mathematics in F.C.E. Primary School: HowFar? STAN 41st Annual Conference Proceedings,279-282.

Bruner J. S. (1967). Toward a Theory of Instruction. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

Eguabor, V. O. (2000). Improvisation and the use of integrated Science Teaching Aids the Junior Secondary School. STAN 41st Annual Conference Proceedings,216-218. Malamed, Connie (Nd). Long-Term Memory: A User's Guide. Available at:http://

theelearningcoach.com/learning/long-term-memory-and-learning/.

Marvin, C. (1995). Critical Issues:Providing Hand-On,Mind-On and Authentic learningExperience in Science. http://www.ncre/.org/North Central Regional Educational laboratory.

Olebukola, P. (2002). Beyond Stereotype to New Trajectories in Science Teaching,

August 12 to 13. STAN 42nd Annual Conference Lead paper, 19-21.

Olagunju, A. M. (2000). An improvisation in the Teachers Towards the Extent of

Improvisation of Resources for Effective Teaching of Biology. STAN 41st

Annual Conference Proceedings, 123-126.

Tuned, S. A. (2000). Standardization of An Improvisation Prism Spectrometer.STAN,

Aug. 36,(1&2), 53-57

U.S. National Science Education Standards (1995). National science education

standards: An overview. Washington, D. C.: National Academy Press. Retrieved

January 8, 2006 from http://books.nap.edu/html/nses/html/

overview.html#organization.

Downloads

Published

2019-04-30

How to Cite

Aprebo, F. C. Y., & Soba, U. (2019). Improvisation and Usefulness of a Scaling Board In Inverse Proportion Problem Solving. Journal of Research in Education and Society (JRES) , 10(1), 45–52. Retrieved from http://icidr.org.ng/index.php/Jres/article/view/1484

Issue

Section

Articles