Drug Reduction Strategies: A Review of International Evidence for ECOWAS Drug Reduction Initiative
Keywords:
drug prevention, drug Reduction Initiative, ECOWAS, Drug Reduction strategiesAbstract
In the light of ECOWAS Drug Reduction Initiative, this study examined some international drug prevention programmes such as; the Project Charlie, NEWADAM, NE Choices; and the Peer Educator models with the view to looking at what works; and how ECOWAS could mainstream and domesticate those models to sustain effectiveness in the ECOWAS Drug Reduction Initiative. The paper also looked at how contentious drug policy might impact upon the sustainability of drug prevention strategies. This study suggested approaches/models to drug prevention such as: the involvement of parents, school teachers, youth workers and the community for sustainable drug prevention strategies in the ECOWAS community. A broad range of activities and initiatives together constitute drug prevention strategies. A comprehensive and inter-collegiate drug prevention strategy that would include, educating and monitoring of the youths, parents, drug dealers, youth workers, teachers, and the local community is therefore very imperative and should be sustained for a long period of time, coupled with rigorous monitoring and evaluation if ECOWAS Drug Reduction Initiative must succeed.
References
Baker, T & Caraher, M (1995). Do it yourself: the process of developing a drugs information
resource for children. Home Office, London, DPI No16.
Bennett, T., Holloway, K. & Williams, T. (2001). Drug use and offending: Summary results of the first
year of the NEW-ADAM research programme. Home Office, London, HORS No 148.
Dawson, N (1997) A Survey of drugs education in Avon primary school. Bristol: Avo and Somerset
Drugs Prevention Team.
Flood-page C., Campell S., Harrington V. and Miller J. (2000). Youth crime: Findings from the 1998-
Youth Lifestyles Survey. Home Office, London, HORS No 209.
Greener, R (1989) Drug education in the primary school. Druglink, 4, 13-15
Home Affairs Committee (2002). Drugs and crime: what are the links? www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/
cm200102/cmselect/cmchaff/318/318m25.htm 27/02/03.
Hough, M. (1996). Drug Misuse and the Criminal Justice System: a review of the literature. Home
Office, London, DPI No 15.
Hurry, J. & Lloyd, C. (1997). A follow up evaluation of Project Charlie. Home Office, London, DPI No
International Narcotics Control Board (2002). Annual report. www.uk.new.yahoo.com/030226/
/du4ik.html 26/02/03.
McGurk, H and Hurry, J (1995) Project Charlie: An evaluation of a life skills drugs education
programme for primary schools. Drug Prevention Initiative Paper No.1. London, Home
Office
Measham, F., Parker, H & Aldridge, F (1998). Starting, Switching, Slowing, Stopping. Home Office,
London, DPI No 21.
Shiner, M., (2000). Doing it for themselves: an evaluation of Peer approaches to drug prevention.
Home Office, London, DPAS No 6.
Stead, M., Mackintosh, A., Eadie, D and Hasting, G (2000). NE Choices: the results of a multicomponent drugs prevention programme for adolescents. Home Office, London, DPAS No
Werch, C. E and Anzalone, D (1995) Stage theory and research on tobacco, alcohol and other drug
use. Journal of Drug Education, 25, 81-98
Whelan, S and Moody, M (1994), DARE, Mansfield. Nottingham: Nottinghamshire Health Promotion.